On 5/1/2010 21:52, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
ChangeLog: Remove variable res which is not really used from test_XcvClosePort.
We should better test for return value than remove it.
Okay. Is this something you can look into (or do you have a hint on how you'd like such a test to look like)? It would be great could you make this change, but if you have guidance I will do my best to give it a try, too.
Gerald
This is a primitive thing, try it if you didn't before. All you need is to add some lines like: --- ok(res == ERROR_SUCCESS /*a proper code here*/, "expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got %d\n", res); --- After that run a test on Windows and Wine (using a bot for example) and make corrections if needed.