Re: load_dll problem

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dimitrie O. Paun"  writes:
> I see two possibilities:
> - Look in the same dir as the .exe.so for the .dll.so
> - Fix the constructor thing properly, and avoid the wrapper
>
> For 2, I'm not even sure what we need to do. You promissed some liker
> magic and eblow greese some time ago, but other than that...

I think the problems that the wrapper was supposed to solve are solved
by using a .exe.so already. There may be some remaining issues with
the constructor order but you will have these with the wrapper too. So
I'd say let's just kill it and see what happens.