Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ucrtbase: Hook up some functions with new names to existing implementations

[Alexandre Julliard]

Martin Storsjo  writes:
> These are some functions that on a first glance seem to have a
> matching signature even though the exact symbol name isn't the
> same as in msvcr120.

It would be better to create a separate function, unless there is strong
evidence that they are doing the exact same thing. For example, I expect
that there's a reason for having both malloc and malloc_base; mapping
them to the same function would make any difference hard to spot.