"Michael" == Michael Cardenas michael.cardenas@lindows.com writes:
Michael> Why would address space separation break the native user dll? Michael> Shouldn't wine's address space handling be the same as windows? Michael> Maybe there's something I'm not understanding...
Well, there's a memory model for win32 and some hacks MS uses for Win9X...
Michael> On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:48:12PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >> > > and I was wondering if it's still true. > yes, and it will >> likely remain so > native user32 requires lots of bits from native > >> kernel (which are no longer available because of > adress space ...
Trying to run with native User32, the first obstacle I meet is K208. After the call to K208, DS==0 and things obvious crash. Making K208 a void function returning 0 continues until the function GETFASTQUEUE, which anounces itself "expect failure!" as the thread-local queue seems not initialized at that moment...
Bye