On November 7, 2002 11:11 am, Vincent Béron wrote:
- Copying a global config if none exists in $HOME/.wine
Hm. Don't know what to think about this one.
- Add a destdir to Make.rules.in (for RPM build)
I thought we don't need one.
- Some modifications to wineshelllink for RH specific things
- Bypass winesetup in winelauncher, copy default instead (RH doesn't
ship winesetup)
- Don't check for __libc_fork in configure.ac (to work on both glibc 2.2
and 2.3?)
Shouldn't we do something in the base distribution, so we don't require this hack?
- Add XSUB.h in winetest.c (fix 'my_perl unknown' error)
Is this for the Perl test framework? I thought we'll get rid of it.
So, some of them I'll keep, and some not. Then there's where everything is packaged. For that I'll follow what they have now, unless it's not reasonable.
Sounds good. However, if our packages are different from the 'official' RH ones, how are we going to name them? They should be named differently, right? Maybe -w1, -w2, etc.