Re: [2/2] quartz/tests: Add tests for IVMRMonitorConfig and IVMRMonitorConfig9 interface

[Alexandre Julliard]

Sebastian Lackner  writes:
> Hi,
>
> in which one? There aren't any VMR tests yet, neither VMR7 nor VMR9
> (VideoRenderer != VMR). Do you think I should put it into the middle of
> some unrelated tests, or start a new file for vmr tests instead?

It's related to video rendering, so videorenderer.c would be
appropriate. It could be renamed to video.c at some point, but that
doesn't matter much; the important thing is to avoid creating too many
separate files.