Re: IStorage* vs. LPSTORAGE vs. winapi_check

[Francois Gouget]

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Marcus Meissner wrote:
[...]
> > > So LPSTORAGE16 would be more fitting I think.
> >
> > You mean in the documentation?
>
> In the documentation I guess it is ok.

Hmm, now I see that IStorage16 and LPSTORAGE16 are defined in 
dlls/ole32/ifs.h and the structures they point to probably don't have 
the same layout as their 32bit equivalents. So it would probably make 
more sense to refer to those types in the documentation. Would the 
attached patch be ok?

(LPOLECLIENTSITE16 is not defined yet in ifs.h or elsewhere but I guess 
that will come)