On 02.03.2017 6:13, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com
dlls/comctl32/propsheet.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ dlls/comctl32/tests/propsheet.c | 4 ---- 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
And of course it's a pure coincidence that you immediately started to work on PSPCB_ADDREF/PSPCB_RELEASE once a patch for it has been added to wine-staging.
Why should or shouldn't it be? What does it have to do with a patch? I worked on getting another propsheet fix tracked in wine-staging in, as well as some of my own. Simply because I care about fixes getting into Wine, you - apparently not so much.
I'd suggest to stop such ill-behaved practices, or at least give a credit to the source if you decided to "borrow" an idea. Or is this an indication that you just ran out of your own ideas to work on? :)
I would gladly give a credit for it, if it worked in a first place. Since it couldn't possibly work, and behavior is well documented, I don't think it qualifies as an idea on its own.
Now, to get all the credit you can possibly get, because that's obviously is the most important thing there is, there is a way that you're well aware of.