Re: Wine Tasklist (UNC)

[Andreas Mohr]

On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 12:08:46PM +1000, Mike McCormack wrote:
> Hi Francois,
>
> I think the best way to handle UNC pathes is to do it properly; Wine
> should talk SMB/NBT directly to other machines on the network, not
> through Linux's VFS layer.
>
> This approach would give high level of flexability to Wine. We could:

Yep. Actually I've never understood why one would go through mount points
for *dynamic* host paths !
In short: do it once, do it *right*.
Don't go for a weak compromise.
That's why I'm strongly in favour of high Samba integration.
Wine really needs this functionality, AFAICS.