Re: Why I think it's worth fixing Valgrind warnings

[Steven Edwards]

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Steven Edwards  wrote:
> I'll laugh. =)  The Windows devs will just use prefast in MSVC. The
> other reasons all sound good though.

Hmm actually I thought prefast had a way to profile running code
rather than just static analysis but I guess not. I must have been
thinking of the Driver Verifier. I think valgrind might actually be
useful then as I don't know of a free profiler for userland code on
windows.