On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 11:27 +0200, Eric Pouech wrote:
well, I don't think we'd want to do the same mess for video than the one we (I?) did (started) for audio. IMO, we'd be better off with a unique winevideo driver (from a windows point of view), which would then determine at startup time (or even at run time when we get HAL integrated) which unix driver to choose
Well yeah, but all this is a bit academic right now. Do we really have anything other than v4l out there? If no, we just have a naming issue :)
... eh, we might have other video solutions on Solaris and *BSD. So what we need is to figure out how similar they are. Anyway, maybe we should name it winevideo after all.