http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/bitkeeper.whynot
What are peoples thoughts on this? It's not (despite appearances) an argument against BitKeeper due to licensing concerns, but rather a short paper on why the author believes the "pyramid" patch/development system is a bad idea.
Alexandre has shown a strong preference for Arch being the future of Wines development, which basically implies a pyramid development model. So I thought this document would be of interesting.
thanks -mike