tor, 12.02.2004 kl. 01.51 skrev Alexandre Julliard:
Ove Kaaven ovek@arcticnet.no writes:
Incidentally, that means I also reversed his indentation suppression of the arguments of these function pointers, but I don't see the "old" indentation as a problem - after all, MIDL does not suppress indentation of function pointer arguments, why should widl?
But I could probably submit a patch with Alexandre's indentation changes preserved if he's really attached to it.
I don't really care about the indentation, but the reason for the change was so that we could use the proper type in the METHODS macro without having to add special support for escaping EOLs.
Hmm, I see. After seeing that you had removed the generate-ICOM-macros support and done a lot of other header cleanup stuff, maybe I was too quick to assume this wouldn't be a problem. OK, guess I'll have to create a new patch...