9 Nov
2009
9 Nov
'09
7:09 p.m.
2009/11/9 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine@gmail.com:
On 11/09/2009 07:25 PM, Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle@t-systems.com wrote:
Reece,
I think we reached agreement on: a) Tests should "usually" succeed.
I didn't read that in any of the emails. Tests should always succeed. the broken() and skip() will help in achieving that.
I used "usually" succeed to avoid handling out-of-memory cases and other similar cases.
- Reece