Mike McCormack wrote:
Robert Shearman wrote:
I think we should leave the reference to the CVS tree page (but still add a link to the Git tree). Some people find it easier to work with CVS than Git.
I think Alexandre would prefer to receive patch submissions in Git format, as they are easier to apply and waste less of his time.
But i also guess that he likes to receive more patches than less. For the casual/new Wine patch submitter CVS is easier to use. If those submitters do more Wine work they will see the light anyway and migrate to git ;)
My changes to the website reflect that support for CVS may not last forever...
Are there any plans to get rid of CVS? I would guess keeping the CVS tree sync from the git tree is low maintanance so it can be kept around "forewever".
bye michael