Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine@gmail.com writes:
Should these printf's be turned into trace/skip?
Yes.
Just sent in a patch for that.
Doing a quick (probably some false positives as well) gives:
comctl32/tests/imagelist.c comctl32/tests/rebar.c comctl32/tests/toolbar.c crypt32/tests/encode.c crypt32/tests/store.c cryptnet/tests/cryptnet.c gdi32/tests/dc.c gdi32/tests/metafile.c hlink/tests/hlink.c imm32/tests/imm32.c kernel32/tests/comm.c kernel32/tests/file.c kernel32/tests/format_msg.c msi/tests/package.c msvcrt/tests/printf.c msvcrt/tests/string.c msvcrt/tests/testlist.c msvcrt/tests/time.c ole32/tests/moniker.c oleaut32/tests/typelib.c rpcrt4/tests/rpc.c rsaenh/tests/rsaenh.c shell32/tests/shellpath.c shell32/tests/shlexec.c user32/tests/msg.c
that also have printf's in them. So another janitorial task?