On 14 May 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
You need to put it in WINEDLLPATH. You could also specify the full path, though this may only work for .exe.so for the moment, I haven't verified that. But I think it would be better to get rid of the wrapper dll concept, and fix the constructor issues properly.
You don't have to convince me -- I've been arguing for that for a long time :)
But the issue is still there. What if the app has a app.dll DLL that is not a wrapper? Anyway, the fix would probably be to simply have . in WINEDLLPATH, no?