On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:20 AM Esme (they/them) vincent@codeweavers.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Vincent Povirk vincent@codeweavers.com
It seems like you're going out of your way to make the tests robust. I don't think that's necessary. It's ok if the tests crash when things fail in ways that aren't known to happen on any existing implementation.
Yes, perhaps I am. Sometimes it's hard to strike the right balance.
Though if I was REALLY going out of my way to be robust, I would be setting path before EVERY time I called GdipCreatePath2, instead of just around the times I am interested in the expected failure.