31 Jan
2006
31 Jan
'06
2:52 p.m.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:28:04 -0800, you wrote:
(Apart from the other discussion) are you sure that you really mean that? "If the length is explicitly stated to be zero then don't do the calcrect but if the length is to be measured and happens to come out as zero then do do the calcrect" If so then I suggest at least a comment that it is deliberate; it sounds counterintuitive to me.
I thought I did even better by providing tests for each of those cases, which pass here under Win2k and XP.
Other weird observations: the different behavior of the A and W functions; the "return 0" in that code are actually "return 1" on Win2k but not on XP.
Rein.