Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com writes:
Sorry about that, I will send a fixed version. However, this rises my other related concern. What do you think about changing this code to always use winsock? We'd use single implementation, making the code cleaner and avoiding breaking other configs. I guess the original reasoning was combination of performance and less mature winsock implementation at the time. I don't think winsock overhead would be too bad in this case and ws2_32 should be up to the task.
I'm working on more changes to this area, so if we're going to switch to winsock, it would make sense to start with it.
If performance is reasonable, I have no objections.