Re: [PATCH 2/4] winevulkan: Replace temp heap_allocs with alloca

[Stefan Dösinger]

Am 05.03.20 um 23:25 schrieb Andrew Wesie:
> Would it make sense to keep the heap allocation as a slow-path if the
> assumption about the allocation size is wrong? For example, if count
> is less than 32 use alloca(), otherwise use the heap to avoid a stack
> overflow.

Similar suggestion: If we keep the heap codepath anyway and have a max
alloca size, would it make sense to have a fixed size local buffer
instead of alloca for the fast case and heap_alloc if something huge
comes along?