--- Lionel Ulmer lionel.ulmer@free.fr wrote:
Stupid question that will probably be ripped to shreds but what about if
we
release the binaries with copy protection support but not put it in CVS (kinda like transgaming, except that users dont have to pay for the
binaries)?
It's illegal according to the LGPL as far as I know (except, of course, if all (c) holders accept to do an exception to the rule :-) ).
I may be wrong though :-)
From my understanding of the LGPL, only offspring have to recontribute to the
main branch (i.e. transgaming would have to recontribute any changes to winehq if they used any of winehq's code, post license switch, unless alexandre agreed to allow them not to) I dont know of any place where it says that the main branch cant put one thing into binary releases that they leave off of the source release...
Of course, I could be wrong as well... <g>
-Dustin
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/