Re: kernel32/tests: Add tests for job objects (try 3)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Andrew Cook  writes:
> process.c already uses child processes and I'd rather not multiplex
> them. Aside from that the only issue with the patch is a missing
> semicolon, which wasn't committed so format-patch ignored it.
>
> Doubting it'll be merged since i tried to add these two years ago, and
> my patches were ignored.

You could start by addressing the comments you did get, before asking
for more. For instance, like Nikolay said, and like I already said last
time around, this doesn't need a new file.