Mike Hearn wrote:
You shouldn't have to statically link the C++ standard library as well,
Yeah, I'm working on a solution that will only static link ICU. When it's ready, we'll see how well it functions.
though not doing so would mean Wine suddenly becomes victim to the C++ ABI breakage which might cause issues for CodeWeavers. Why do you need to do this?
Because ICU itself is written in C++. The moment I static link it into Wine (gdi.dll.so, to be specific), it develops a depndancy on stdc++.
Alexander - are you sure you don't want to put all the BiDi stuff into a seperate DLL?
Shachar