Re: msi: Remove tentative definition of static array with no size specifier

[Alexandre Julliard]

Andrew Talbot  writes:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > That's fine, but it's not worth it to me, and I'm pretty sure Julliard
> > won't accept it either.
>
> I understand and suspect you are right. Maybe I should have made an RFC
> rather than opting for trial by patch. :)

I think it's worth fixing, but it's easier to do by avoiding the need
for the forward declaration, there's only one place that uses it.