On Mar 16, 2022, at 12:20 AM, Eric Pouech eric.pouech@orange.fr wrote:
Le 15/03/2022 à 20:05, Brendan Shanks a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Brendan Shanks bshanks@codeweavers.com
programs/winedbg/gdbproxy.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/programs/winedbg/gdbproxy.c b/programs/winedbg/gdbproxy.c index 0268a288481..bcde120adeb 100644 --- a/programs/winedbg/gdbproxy.c +++ b/programs/winedbg/gdbproxy.c @@ -482,7 +482,6 @@ static BOOL handle_exception(struct gdb_context* gdbctx, EXCEPTION_DEBUG_INFO* e { const THREADNAME_INFO *threadname = (const THREADNAME_INFO *)rec->ExceptionInformation; struct dbg_thread *thread;
char name[9]; SIZE_T read; if (threadname->dwType != 0x1000)
@@ -494,10 +493,12 @@ static BOOL handle_exception(struct gdb_context* gdbctx, EXCEPTION_DEBUG_INFO* e if (thread) { if (gdbctx->process->process_io->read( gdbctx->process->handle,
threadname->szName, name, sizeof(name), &read) && read == sizeof(name))
threadname->szName, thread->name, sizeof(thread->name), &read) &&
read == sizeof(thread->name))
it looks a bit strange to me that we can always expect being able to read sizeof(thread->name) here...
using existing memory_get_string helper might be a better idea
Thanks, I hadn’t seen that function before, I’ll use it. I think the end result will be the same though, since memory_get_string() uses the same read() that's implemented with ReadProcessMemory(), which doesn’t do partial reads. ReadProcessMemory() could fail if sizeof(thread->name) would overflow into an inaccessible page, but for a convenience feature like thread names (and this is the old/deprecated way of setting them) I’m not sure it’s worth handling that rare case.
Brendan