On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 10:17 -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
On 3/25/07, H. Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/03/07, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmx.at wrote:
So which of the following things do we want for 1.0?
While nice to have, I don't think d3d10 or some of the more advanced SM 3.0 features should block 1.0. You already know my opinion on broken drivers.
Things that aren't there, but IMO should be:
- Make GLSL default
Well from my test GLSL is just about on par with ARB's performance at this time.
http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.33 and http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.6
I still need to run PCMark04 and file a bug report and 0.9.33 will be complete.
I am aware there are a couple remaining task that need completed before GLSL is set as default, just thought I would share the performance state at this time.
Tom
Does anyone here know if the NVIDIA Windows drivers are still rigged with regards to the various 3DMark suite of benchmarks? There was a scandal a while back, and the company claimed to pull their special hacks out, but then they were caught again later doing the same thing. It'd be a shame if we were testing rigged Windows drivers vs unrigged Linux ones.
Thanks, Scott Ritchie