Yes, this was my bad. Keep "dxgi" for dxgi header patches and "d3d11" for d3d11 header patches.
Okay great well at least we have 2 of 6 sorted. I will redo the other 4 now. :)
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am 2015-02-10 um 13:17 schrieb Jacek Caban:
On 02/10/15 13:11, Martell Malone wrote:
Before I resubmit 4 and 6 however I need to know if I should have "include:" or "dxgi:" + "d3d11:" in them as these create new files
We already have both variants in Git history and there was never a problem with it. If you ask me, use whatever you prefer.
Yes, this was my bad. Keep "dxgi" for dxgi header patches and "d3d11" for d3d11 header patches. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU2hQpAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMw9DIP/j06y+HuWrf9EF8xLvGsGtgt UHuxizNftqQO2himHd7LNhnr1kFxFrM/3ACLIjHKlKpJq8WyTDZeVpbdNt0tcfto tX8Sc2gPlwjOckLuUrnj2yEth4+Q2Ns+4hyZNBB+pBJQ7k+Bq7UJ34Bm0qRDD0VG SUHpTwlR/tIHAadPO+gTjnyCjA3lRNDRr754dQBsiH2IMNcjLAWE1FYE9zJf6YXo Z6OFH+7qMSkRPlv1zNBMQfPo/irg08eq2EMd28hytFwqweZ3TqiCpdi+akYbZocS a9eUWDbkC8VCYE9BFdhL2xbxF+bcryEXbHSqUeU5NBihIXMLN1SLr0Bq9GK5PSnU 2mRXV1vxuKKQ/ncgB4vdJUEKo0hhKFpZy8FDpB3tc11zIFrLlgFBEnSSQDEl/AHQ JZKiCoGM+FWB5IiRlxZghD3SqL1glOceWrdiOqJgOTjcYfU8QGzziPVOkvvbIcPP Ac6bZA5XuaHFHSvBooEg13BsXNJFH++0n9QVIX3zrSqE0RTwJjSfoPnqWukpEaCZ RRCSlN7RnLGwRsovYbyn+BiDU3p06CzGf4R+zxew4ZVahe0Vu2uwBc0e/fdEu31M RsSL3hlAEhLVx+nHf8TFpU5xduPVISLbNyCbQhP3HCImYvzNn74Y/qbiiFm79o3n j3FXUBPKBh/NU+YdQVRS =elPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----