5 Oct
2004
5 Oct
'04
4:25 a.m.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" dpaun@rogers.com wrote:
I've explained that already: the comment's purpose is to identify the *documentation* that the code has been audited against. Which is the commctl 6.0 documentation. This is where MS says the standard controls reside in XP, what's the problem?
The problem is that the documentation is misleading (intentionally or not it doesn't matter), and following a wrong doc is not what we want to do in Wine.
--
Dmitry.