Re: WININET: move to Windows sockets

[Dan Kegel]

Geoff wrote:
> Or we write our own BIO that wraps up whatever glue is desirable on the 
> wine-side. Worst-case (and it's not that bad an alternative) is that you 
> use a memory-base BIO to encapsulate all I/O and worry about moving data 
> to and from "sockets", whatever they look like, afterwards.

That's what I've always done.  And it seems I've managed
(via the rant at http://kegel.com/ssl/api.html) to convince
Sun to make that the standard way to do ssl with NIO under the next JDK,
kinda.  So it's not a bad way to go at all.
- Dan