On Tuesday 26 September 2006 22:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Robert Lunnon bobl@optushome.com.au writes:
Well thats at least a reasoned response, even if I don't agree with the reasoning. But again you simply miss the point. I don't care that Alexandre doesn't move my patches (because its not true that he doesn't) and since I now have a patch management capability which allows me to manage my local tree and keep in sync with wineHQ. But wine is my/our toy now as well as Alexandre's and I for one want to make it better.
In that Alexandre and I should be in agreement and perhaps he should consider some of the positive measures I have suggested.
To be honest, I have no idea what it is that you are suggesting. All I see is phrases like "community focused process" or "acceptance policy" which frankly are just meaningless buzzwords. If you expect anything to happen, you'll need to make much more concrete suggestions, and provide examples to make us understand how what you are suggesting would work in practice, and how it would be different from what we are doing now.
Pleased to, I'll put my explanations along with suggestions into a material form and present them here in a new thread.
Bob