Re: [PATCH 1/2] server: Always place compiler barrier before atomic memory stores.

[Rémi Bernon]

On 2/10/22 18:43, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> On 2/10/22 18:36, Jin-oh Kang wrote:
> > We still support GCC 4.x (an in-support RHEL/CentOS release uses it), 
> > so I
> > think we still need some wrappers around it. That and the GCC bug.
>
> The __sync intrinsices seems to have be there since GCC 4.2, then 
> deprecated when __atomic where introduced in GCC 4.7. What's that bug?

Nvm I missed that part of the first patch.