Re: native user32 dll

[Ulrich Weigand]

Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Don't we want to be more like win9x for the moment since most of the NT
> dlls are unimplemented right now?

That's Alexandre's decision.  But in any case I agree with Alexandre
in this instance; in making a fundamental design decision like this
goals like stability should count more than minor issues like whether
native user.exe runs (which might or might not run due to a whole
bunch of other issues, and is not representative of *any* other
workload ...).

Bye,
Ulrich