Re: add epoll implementation to libwine_port (take 3)

[Shachar Shemesh]

Mike McCormack wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > [Q] Does that mean that we directly check if it is supported in 
> > kernel, bypassing glibc all together? how do we avoid conflicts with 
> > glibc?
>
> The definitions are wrapped by #ifndef HAVE_EPOLL_CREATE, which is set 
> by a configure check.
>
> The end result is that we use this code if libc does not provide an 
> epoll implementation, and use libc's if it is available.
>
> Mike

You do realize that many (somewhat old) glibcs have epoll_create defined 
that is hardwired to return E_NOSYS without calling the kernel, right?

Shachar