Le ven 18/03/2005 à 13:14, Hiji a écrit : [snip]
but it also minimizes the propagation of old documentation which no one will have the power to update. By not consolidating the documentation resource, there will eventually be a certain percentage of the Wine userbase trying to follow outdated Wine documents.
As long as they follow the docs on the same Wine snapshot from which their documentation came, it's good by me. Mixing new docs with old Wine will do no good ("I have symlinks in my ~/.wine/dosdevices, but Wine is expecting drive definitions in config"), as well as mixing old docs with new Wine ("I don't have a config...").
I think most binary packages already provide the docs in a compiled form. If they do not, they should do so, at least in a wine-doc(s) package (if that's the distribution way of doing it), or in the main wine package.
Vincent