Chris Morgan chmorgan@gmail.com writes:
Wouldn't a review of the proposed dib engine be useful? One that included concerns, things that needed to be changed etc? Everyone involved seems to be asking for leadership and guidance about how to proceed, wouldn't a thorough review of the proposed design give direction towards an "acceptable" design?
Of course, but a thorough review takes time, lots of time. If you want Huw or myself to invest that kind of time, you have to demonstrate that it's worth it. That was my point about first establishing a track record with simpler stuff.
The last time I rejected a simple patch from Massimo, he basically said that he didn't have time to fix the patch and just dropped it. That doesn't encourage me to spend more effort on reviewing his more complex stuff.