Hi, After debug the get_graphics_bounds, I found that the default mapping mode and graphics mode of graphics->hdc are: MapMode=MM_TEXT, GraphicsMode=GM_COMPATIBLE.
If we don't use GetWindowOrgEx, then change this condition statement: if (graphics->hdc && (GetMapMode(graphics->hdc) != MM_TEXT || GetGraphicsMode(graphics->hdc) != GM_COMPATIBLE))
to
if (graphics->hdc )
is OK ?
If I fill a rectangle at (0,0) using GDI+, on an HDC with window origin (5,5), what is the origin of that rectangle on the screen?
I think the answer is (5,5).
Last, I modified my patch and test, please help me review it again when you are free. Thanks you.
------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Vincent Povirk"madewokherd@gmail.com; Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2014 01:51 AM To: "wine-devel@winehq.org"wine-devel@winehq.org; Cc: "刘昌辉"liuchanghui@linuxdeepin.com; Subject: Re: gdiplus: fix GdipFillRectangleI no effect on memory DC whosewindoworigin point has changed
- rect->X = 0; - rect->Y = 0; + /*The user maybe has called SetWindowOrgEx to change origin point*/ + POINT pt = {0, 0}; + GetWindowOrgEx(graphics->hdc, &pt); + rect->X = pt.x; + rect->Y = pt.y;
I don't think we should use GetWindowOrgEx in gdiplus. There are too many ways to change the mapping of co-ordinates for an HDC, and it doesn't make sense to specifically account for them all.
In get_graphics_bounds, we already have code that accounts for the HDC transform using DPtoLP. Maybe we should do that even when GetMapMode == MM_TEXT.
Transforming the region in alpha_blend_pixels_hrgn looks wrong to me, because we can't do that in the general case. Logical coordinates on the HDC may not be pixels.
Your test is very unclear. A good test for this should make it obvious how the HDC's transform affects GDI+ world coordinates. If I fill a rectangle at (0,0) using GDI+, on an HDC with window origin (5,5), what is the origin of that rectangle on the screen?