27 Mar
2006
27 Mar
'06
4:19 p.m.
Petr Tesarik hat@tesarici.cz writes:
That means that Windows XP creates a new thread in the given process and breaks it at DbgBreak().
Does this mean that we may avoid sending SIGTRAP altogether?
Creating a new thread is probably even harder, but yes we can certainly avoid SIGTRAP. One possible way is to use SIGUSR1 to change the thread context to simulate a call to DbgBreakPoint.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org