2013/3/11 Jeff Layton jlayton@redhat.com:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:25:31 +0400 Pavel Shilovsky piastry@etersoft.ru wrote:
to make it match CIFS and VFS variants.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky piastry@etersoft.ru
fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c b/fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c index 494c912..11e589e 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static const struct status_to_posix_error smb2_error_map_table[] = { {STATUS_PORT_CONNECTION_REFUSED, -ECONNREFUSED, "STATUS_PORT_CONNECTION_REFUSED"}, {STATUS_INVALID_PORT_HANDLE, -EIO, "STATUS_INVALID_PORT_HANDLE"},
{STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION, -EBUSY, "STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION"},
{STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION, -ETXTBSY, "STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION"}, {STATUS_QUOTA_EXCEEDED, -EDQUOT, "STATUS_QUOTA_EXCEEDED"}, {STATUS_INVALID_PAGE_PROTECTION, -EIO, "STATUS_INVALID_PAGE_PROTECTION"},Actually, I think Sachin is converting the CIFS STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION to translate to EBUSY, since that seems to better reflect the situation. I'd suggest dropping this patch, unless you have a specific need for this error return here.
Yes, I am ok to drop this patch - accoring to the previous discussion in linux-cifs@ it is no suitable.