Stefan Leichter wrote:
Am Monday 13 August 2007 13:28 schrieb Paul Vriens:
Stefan Leichter wrote:
Am Friday 10 August 2007 12:15 schrieb Paul Vriens:
Hi,
I just want to get people's opinion(s) about the needs/requirements/whishes for both the conformance tests themselves (including winetest) as well as the webpages.
I'll collect the information and will put it on the wiki.
Cheers,
Paul.
What about marking the "todo_wine" on the web page somehow?
Bye Stefan
Hi Stefan,
todo_wine will only be present on a Wine testrun. Results for each test are available (including todo) when you hover over the single results.
We can of course use a general 'todo' visualization but who do you like to see that?
Or was you're idea to show todo_wine's in Windows results !?
Cheers,
Paul.
Some days ago i had an issue with an installer. I remembered that i had this long time ago and that i wrote a test to document the difference and a patch to fix the issue. Only the test was accepted not the patch.
Having the todo_wine on the test result page might have saved me some time digging through the ChangeLog files.
Also it someone is locking for something todo, he can look to the test results and see the known issues. I don't thing all issues are all documented in bugzilla.
Bye Stefan
Hi Stefan,
I've been playing a bit with have the 'todo_<platform>' on the page. In theory it's possible that there are todo_<platform>'s that why I don't refer to todo_wine.
On http://www.xs4all.nl/~pvriens/200708181000_orig/ you can see the current situation for some random test results.
On http://www.xs4all.nl/~pvriens/200708181000_with_todo/ I've added a column with todo's if one or more tests have a todo_item. This todo columns will only be present in the main summary and shows the maximum number of todo's for that test for that platform.
I've tried adding the todo information to the current table cells but didn't find a satisfactory (that is nice looking) way. This is especially true for tests that also have a skip.
As said before in theory we could have todo's for several platforms and different todo results per test. In practice we will only have todo_wine's and the number of todo's per test will be the same.
Needless to say that for this to work we need people to run tests on Wine and have the reports sent in.
Let me know what you think of it. (the patch to 'gather' is attached).
Cheers,
Paul.