11 Jun
2020
11 Jun
'20
8:13 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 2:21 PM Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com
I left behaviour for num == 1 unchanged, but according to the comment it should be 0. We don't seem to have a test for that.
You mean for num == 0? That's sort of an invalid value, it shouldn't matter (and returning 1 for that seems safer anyway).