Re: Allow native dlls and debugmsg in runtest

[Eric Pouech]

Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > > > > > "Francois" == Francois Gouget  writes:
> Francois> On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Uwe Bonnes wrote: [...]
> >> But then you have to set and unset WINEOPTIONS quite frequently.
>
> Francois> Not if you type:
>
> Francois> WINEOPTIONS="-debugmsg +foo" runtest
>
> Francois> When you do that WINEOPTIONS is set for that command only. The
> Francois> only drawback is 'WINEOPTIONS' is longer to type than '-d',
> Francois> but with command recall who cares.
>
> But you need to remember WINEOPTION, how to use and what options are
> available and the shell syntax. The few lines added to runtest by my test
> relief the user of that task but also leave you the posibility to still use
> WINEOPTIONS.

the bad side of the patch is that the user has to know the command line 
option of runtest...
moreover, runtest should be used in most of the cases without options
it's only developpers would may do some fiddling with options
at some point in time, I wouldn't be surprised either if wine drops its 
command line option in favor of another mechanism
so I'd favor not adding too many options to runtest
A+