Hi Dmitry,
On 09/02/15 07:44, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
- if (member == DISPID_HTTPREQUEST_OPTION)
Why can't we use standard, ITypeInfo-based implementation here?
- {
VARIANT ret_value, option;UINT err_pos;if (!result) result = &ret_value;if (!arg_err) arg_err = &err_pos;VariantInit( &option );VariantInit( result );if (flags == DISPATCH_PROPERTYPUT){hr = DispGetParam( params, 0, VT_I4, &option, arg_err );if (FAILED(hr)) return hr;hr = IWinHttpRequest_put_Option( &request->IWinHttpRequest_iface, V_I4( &option ), params->rgvarg[0] );if (FAILED(hr))WARN("put_Option(%d) failed: %x\n", V_I4( &option ), hr);return hr;}else if (flags & (DISPATCH_PROPERTYGET | DISPATCH_METHOD)){hr = DispGetParam( params, 0, VT_I4, &option, arg_err );if (FAILED(hr)) return hr;hr = IWinHttpRequest_get_Option( &request->IWinHttpRequest_iface, V_I4( &option ), result );if (FAILED(hr))WARN("get_Option(%d) failed: %x\n", V_I4( &option ), hr);return hr;}return S_OK;
I don't think silently returning S_OK is right for not handled flags.
Thanks, Jacek