Re: [PATCH] ntdll: Don't reset rsp to context->Rsp until exception data is copied.

[Paul Gofman]

On 7/2/20 12:09, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul Gofman  writes:
> > Context record may be stored on stack below context stack. This
> > happens, e. g., with RtlRaiseException().
>
> That doesn't seem right, there may be other things on the stack too. Is
> there a reason to switch stack to context->Rsp at all?

Exception unwinding does not work otherwise, and that matches stack
layout on Windows: the context and exception record on stack has a fixed
gap after context's Rsp. But it looks we don't need anything else from
the stack besides the context, or am I missing something?