Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 10/20/2011 06:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wine-devel@kievinfo.com wrote:
device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207 device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207 make: *** [device.ok] Error 8
Could be because of definition problems. Here's what I get compiling wine64: ../../../../wine.git/dlls/dinput/tests/device.c:117:5: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type ../../../../wine.git/dlls/dinput/tests/device.c:120:5: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
HRESULT defined as "typedef LONG HRESULT;". But error code defined as: #define DIERR_NOTBUFFERED 0x80040207L
Not sure what to do here. Test passed on all win64 bit platforms according to test bot. So unless we want to redefine all LONG constants in PSDK (and remove that last L) I'd say ignore this.
How can we ignore it? Once we check it in, the 64 bit build will start failing its tests :-(
So you saying we should modify all long error constants in PSDK? I'm not sure what else can be done.
Yes, that's the right way. I got that as a janitorial task from Alexandre during the last WineConf. One commit is in already http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=0324fc57469f402102b677c4e3...
While the search and replace is trivial it uncovers interesting challenges and opportunities in the Wine code... That's why I'm not done yet with this task.
bye michael