On Tuesday 11 November 2008 07:28:11 pm Austin English wrote:
- TRACE(output); + TRACE(output, "%s");
I think you put this on backwards. Some of the other patches seem to be the same way. This gets rid of the warning because you add an extra parameter, which the compiler takes to mean that you know what you're doing. But if the input string contains an %code, it'll interpret the value incorrectly.