Re: My WineHQ menu structure proposal

[Jeremy White]

> - The "Supported Applications" idea is a good one, and I've been
> advocating it for a few days now. This should be a hand-maintained
> list of apps what we have 'officially' tested, and know for a fact
> that work decently in Wine. See the current efforts to come up with
> the Gold list of apps supported under Wine.

I actually think that we could have exactly one entry - and
that it be called 'Supported Applications'.  That's the link
people will click on; it addresses their immediate question.
Trying to be more semantically precise with the main menu
link is a mistake, imo.
> - Minor nit, but I still don't like CVS under Downloads. First off,
> nobody thinks about using CVS as a Download option. There is a big
> semantical impedance mismatch here. CVS is viewed as a development
> tool. Also people using CVS don't go to Download, and viceversa.
> I think it's a mistake to group items based on their form/syntax,
> rather than meaning/semantics. In this case, the grouping is based
> on the fact that there are bits going across the wire, and I don't
> feel it's a meaningful distinction for anyone.

I disagree here.  I don't think we should expound on CVS here, I'm
just thinking a link to the detailed instructions under Development.
What's the first thing a newbie gets told after reporting
a problem:   "Have you tried it against the CVS tip?"
> I suggest we work off of your latest proposal, and suggest 'patches'
> to it, if anyone feels there should be changes. But this does seem
> to bring us closer to a universally accepted solution. Yay!

I'm good with that.  Double yay!