On 09.10.2015 12:15, Austin English wrote:
Try 2: move implementation to ntdll.RtlGetCurrentProcessorNumberEx with a forward from kernel32. Initialize Group/Processor to 0.
For https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39376
+/**********************************************************************
RtlGetCurrentProcessorNumberEx [NTDLL.@]- */
+VOID WINAPI RtlGetCurrentProcessorNumberEx(PPROCESSOR_NUMBER processor)
I think its preferred to use PROCESSOR_NUMBER * here.
+{
- processor->Group = 0;
- processor->Number = 0;
The ->Number member could be initialized to the result to NtGetCurrentProcessorNumber(). Initializing ->Group to 0 is correct because Wine supports max 64 processors. According to MSDN, the struct also has a ->Reserved member, which probably should be set to zero.
- FIXME(":%p stub\n", processor);
It might be better to print the FIXME before accessing the pointer, this allows to see if applications pass garbage pointers before the crash happens. ;)
+}