On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
On 23-05-10 01:57, Dan Kegel wrote:
I think it's a good idea. 'regression' isn't as strong as 'bisected'.
Unless there are objections, I'll add the keyword on Monday.
I think I'll object. I don't see any point in the bisected tag that regression doesn't already cover. As far as I know as soon as you tag something as regression you either already have bisected it, or will be asked to bisect it quickly after adding the regression tag.
Cheers, Maarten
You know what would be neat? Turn fixing Wine into a game. Give people points for successfully reporting bugs, take points away for reporting duplicates, give more points for successfully bisecting a bug...
Erich Hoover ehoover@mines.edu