Re: bogus patch to bind() dlls/winsock/socket.c (request removal)

[Mike Hearn]

That looks familiar. In fact, the TRACE was originally a FIXME but it
caused so much spew with so many apps I changed it. I couldn't see exactly
what needed to be fixed given the contents of the message - it seems to be
simply informing us of progress, but it's a possibility somebody knew this
wasn't correct.

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:09:52 -0600, Jeremy White wrote:
> Index: dlls/winsock/socket.c
>
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.144
> diff -u -r1.144 socket.c
> --- dlls/winsock/socket.c	2 Jan 2004 20:12:00 -0000	1.144
> +++ dlls/winsock/socket.c	10 Jan 2004 22:56:57 -0000
> @@ -1302,10 +1302,6 @@
>               else
>               {
>                   int on = 1;
> -
>            /* The game GrandPrixLegends binds more than one time, 
>
> but does
> -
>             * not do a SO_REUSEADDR - Stevens says this is ok */
> -
>            TRACE( "Setting WS_SO_REUSEADDR on socket before we 
>
> bind it\n");
> -
>            WS_setsockopt( s, WS_SOL_SOCKET, WS_SO_REUSEADDR, 
>
> (char*)&on, sizeof(on) );
>               if (bind(fd, uaddr, uaddrlen) < 0)
>               {